Health Improvements
Major improvements in life expectancy (and many other measures of health) across the world
- Poverty reduction
- Technology development and innovation
- Technology diffusion and adoption
- Access to better services, including health care
R Code
gapminder %>%
group_by(year) %>%
summarize(lifeExp = median(lifeExp),
gdpMed = median(gdpPercap)) %>%
ggplot(aes(year,lifeExp)) + geom_line(alpha = 1/3) + theme_bw() +
labs(x = "Year",
y = "Life Expectancy (years)",
title = "Median life expectancy across the world")
Health and Wealth
R Code
ggplot(data = gapminder, mapping = aes(x = gdpPercap, y = lifeExp)) +
geom_point(size = 1) + theme_bw() + scale_x_continuous(label = comma) +
labs(x = "GDP Per Capita ($US)",
y = "Life Expectancy (years)",
title = "Life expectancy and GDP")
R Code
ggplot(gapminder, aes(gdpPercap, lifeExp, size = pop)) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.5, show.legend = FALSE) +
scale_colour_manual(values = country_colors) +
scale_size(range = c(2, 12)) +
scale_x_log10() +
facet_wrap(~continent) +
labs(title = 'Year: {frame_time}', x = 'Log GDP Per Capita ($US)', y = 'Life Expectancy (years)') +
transition_time(year) +
ease_aes('linear') +
theme_bw()
Warning: No shared levels found between `names(values)` of the manual scale and the
data's colour values.
But the U.S. is unique
R Code
mycolors <- c("US" = "red", "other" = "grey50")
gapminder %>% filter(country %in% c("Canada", "France", "Germany", "Italy", "Japan", "United Kingdom", "United States")) %>%
mutate(highlight = ifelse(country=="United States", "US", "other")) %>%
ggplot(aes(gdpPercap, lifeExp, size = pop)) +
geom_point(alpha = 0.5, show.legend = FALSE, aes(color=highlight)) +
scale_color_manual("U.S.", values = mycolors) +
scale_size(range = c(2, 12)) +
scale_x_comma(limits=c(0,55000)) +
labs(title = 'Year: {frame_time}', x = 'GDP Per Capita ($US)', y = 'Life Expectancy (years)') +
transition_time(year) +
ease_aes('linear') +
theme_bw()
Health Care Spending and Outcomes
What does that mean?
- Are we just woefully inefficient?
- Yes, but the complete answer is more complicated
- U.S. very good in some areas (breast cancer treatment, interventional cardiology)
- Let’s look at some more graphs from the Commonwealth Fund
Why Study Economics of Health Care?
Health and health care are constantly changing
Health expenditures in 2020: $4.1 trillion, 19.7% of GDP, $12,530 per person (from NHE Fact Sheet)
U.S. health care is uniquely inefficient in many ways
Lots of interesting economic issues in health care, not all unique to the US.
- Extremely heterogeneous products
- Asymmetric information between patients and physicians
- Unobservable quality (experience good)
- Unpredictable need (inability to shop in many cases)
- Distortion of incentives due to insurance
- Adverse selection (asymmetric information between patients and insurers)
- These factors exist in other markets and in other countries, but…
- Health care is unique in the combination of these issues
- U.S. is unique in the extent of these issues in health care (policy problems)